//Let’s not destroy innovation by excessive fudding and calling rival coins scam.

Let’s not destroy innovation by excessive fudding and calling rival coins scam.

There are projects in the crypto sphere that we all individually dislike, but sometimes these projects do something new and we should at least given them a chance to try out their innovations.At the very least allow these projects to have a chance, and your favored projects will eventually adopt the innovations of those that you dislike.We can warn people about what we think are the cons, but let’s not fud the project to such an extent that people just ignore it and the project devs never get a chance to prove themselves.Examples: Zcash is often rightly criticized for its trusted setup and founders fees. But it gave us zkSNARKs. You can tell people to be wary and mention that it has optional privacy but don’t fud it to such a degree hoping that the project halts.People mock Cardano investors for buying into something that is very incomplete. But Cardano also deserves credit for all the research and innovation they are doing. I hardly see anyone on this sub giving them that credit but they make fun of Cardano investors. Why not just tell them to diversify?People rightly criticize WTC for that Twitter prize draw incident. But why not give them credit for even having an ultra thin RFID sensor that can be tracked on a blockchain?Why is our criticism so unbalanced? Why not say the pros and cons instead of just fudding?Disclaimer: I hold no Zcash or Cardano (but I hope to buy the latter in a few months). I hold a small amount of WTC.

There are projects in the crypto sphere that we all individually dislike, but sometimes these projects do something new and we should at least given them a chance to try out their innovations.

At the very least allow these projects to have a chance, and your favored projects will eventually adopt the innovations of those that you dislike.

We can warn people about what we think are the cons, but let's not fud the project to such an extent that people just ignore it and the project devs never get a chance to prove themselves.

Examples: Zcash is often rightly criticized for its trusted setup and founders fees. But it gave us zkSNARKs. You can tell people to be wary and mention that it has optional privacy but don't fud it to such a degree hoping that the project halts.

People mock Cardano investors for buying into something that is very incomplete. But Cardano also deserves credit for all the research and innovation they are doing. I hardly see anyone on this sub giving them that credit but they make fun of Cardano investors. Why not just tell them to diversify?

People rightly criticize WTC for that Twitter prize draw incident. But why not give them credit for even having an ultra thin RFID sensor that can be tracked on a blockchain?

Why is our criticism so unbalanced? Why not say the pros and cons instead of just fudding?

Disclaimer: I hold no Zcash or Cardano (but I hope to buy the latter in a few months). I hold a small amount of WTC.